Top 100 Quantum Theorems

by Marco David and Jens Palsberg

This list collects 100 important theorems in quantum physics, quantum information and quantum computing. Inspired by the list of the top 100 mathematical theorems of which Freek Wiedijk tracks the formalization progress, this is a similarly arbitrary and necessarily incomplete list with no particular order.

We welcome submissions from your interactive theorem proving community, and will link formal proofs below.

Leaderboard

    Acknowledgements. Thank you to Rodolfo R. Soldati, Alex Meiburg, Serge Massar, Tein van der Lugt, Debbie Leung, Matilde Baroni, Eduardo Martín-Martínez, Jean-Yves Desaules, Maksym Serbyn for their contributions. We are grateful for support by the NSF Challenge Institute for Quantum Computation.

    Legend:
    Foundations Mathematical Physics Quantum Information Quantum Algorithms Condensed Matter High Energy Physics

    The List

    1. The Spectral Theorem   Isabelle: linkRocq: linkLean: link 1, link 2
    2. Eigenstates in an infinite square well  
    3. The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator  
    4. Ehrenfest’s Theorem  
    5. Quantum tunneling through a finite potential barrier  
    6. Conservation of the probability (4-)current 
    7. Eigenstates of a δ-distribution well 
    8. Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation  
    9. Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff Formula  
    10. Trotter Product Formula (Lie–Trotter–Kato)  
    11. Simultaneous diagonalization of commuting observables  
    12. Noether’s Theorem  
    13. Wigner’s Theorem  
    14. Stone–von Neumann Theorem  
    15. Spectrum of the hydrogen atom (Coulomb potential)  
    16. Addition of angular momentum (e.g. Clebsch–Gordan)  
    17. Wigner–Eckart Theorem  
    18. Power-series spectrum of a perturbed time-independent Hamiltonian 
    19. Dyson series for time-dependent perturbation theory  
    20. Correctness of the Rayleigh–Ritz method  
    21. Correctness of the Born–Oppenheimer approximation  
    22. The Adiabatic Theorem  
    23. Berry phase (Geometric phase)  
    24. Superdense coding  
    25. Quantum teleportation with shared entanglement  
    26. No-Cloning Theorem / No-Broadcast Theorem / No-Teleportation Theorem  
    27. No-Communication Theorem  
    28. No-Deleting Theorem  
    29. Schrödinger–HJW Theorem (purification of mixed states) 
    30. Schmidt decomposition for Hilbert spaces  
    31. Bell’s Theorem (QM violates CHSH inequality)  
    32. Monogamy of entanglement  
    33. Tsirelson bound  
    34. Correctness of the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm   Rocq: link
    35. Correctness of Shor’s algorithm   Rocq: link
    36. Correctness of Grover’s algorithm   Rocq: link
    37. The Bennett–Bernstein–Brassard–Vazirani Theorem (BBBV)  
    38. Quantum key distribution by BB84  
    39. Impossibility of quantum bit commitment (Mayers–Lo–Chau) 
    40. Solovay–Kitaev Theorem  
    41. Universality of sets of two-qubit quantum gates  
    42. Universality of the Toffoli and the Hadamard  
    43. Five two-qubit gates are necessary and sufficient to implement a Toffoli gate 
    44. Six two-qubit linear nearest-neighbor gates are necessary and sufficient to implement a Toffoli gate 
    45. 3n CX gates are necessary to implement a multi-control Toffoli gate with n-1 controls 
    46. Adiabatic and gate-based quantum computing are equivalent up to polynomial factors  
    47. The Threshold Theorem (quantum fault-tolerance)  
    48. Petz recovery map  
    49. Choi’s Theorem on completely positive maps  
    50. Choi–Jamiołkowski isomorphism (channel-state duality)  
    51. Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction  
    52. Gelfand–Naimark Theorem  
    53. Krein–Milman Theorem  
    54. Stinespring’s Factorization Theorem / Naimark’s Dilation Theorem   Lean: link
    55. Continuous Functional Calculus   Lean: link 1, link 2
    56. Gleason’s Theorem  
    57. Holevo’s Theorem  
    58. Pusey–Barrett–Rudolph Theorem  
    59. Kochen–Specker Theorem  
    60. The Spectral Theorem for PVMs  
    61. Strong subadditivity of quantum entropy  
    62. Entanglement-assisted classical capacity of quantum channels  
    63. Quantum state discrimination for two states (Ivanović–Dieks–Peres Limit)  
    64. The Lloyd–Shor–Devetak Theorem for quantum channel capacity  
    65. Eastin–Knill Theorem  
    66. Gottesman–Knill Theorem  
    67. Magic state distillation  
    68. Correctness of distillation of Bell pairs 
    69. 1D gapped Hamiltonians have area-law ground states 
    70. The Lieb–Robinson bound  
    71. Onsager’s solution to the 2D Ising model  
    72. MIP* = RE 
    73. BQP \(\subseteq\) PP  
    74. QIP = PSPACE 
    75. Quantum Stein Lemma 
    76. Quantum 3-SAT is QMA1-complete 
    77. Computing the Jones polynomial at roots of unity is BQP-hard 
    78. Uniqueness of 4-dimensional representations of the Clifford algebra (up to unitary equivalence) 
    79. Spin-statistics Theorem  
    80. Reeh–Schlieder Theorem  
    81. Wick’s Theorem  
    82. Elitzur’s Theorem  
    83. 2D TQFTs are equivalent to Frobenius algebras  
    84. Chern–Simons theory can compute the Jones polynomial  
    85. The CFT central charge is its entanglement entropy 
    86. Osterwalder–Schrader Reconstruction Theorem  
    87. 4D Gaussian free field theory satisfies the Osterwalder-Schrader axioms  Lean: link
    88. Bisognano–Wichmann Theorem 
    89. Wood–Spekkens–Bell Theorem 
    90. Correctness of block encoding 
    91. Correctness of Hamiltonian simulation by Trotterization 
    92. Correctness of Hamiltonian simulation by Linear Combination of Unitaries 
    93. Correctness of Hamiltonian simulation by Qubitization 
    94. Qubit reuse is NP-complete 
    95. Correctness of a quantum circuit optimizer  Rocq: link
    96. Correctness of the toric code  
    97. Correctness of entanglement-assisted stabilizer codes 
    98. The Knill–Laflamme conditions 
    99. Correctness of approximate circuit synthesis 
    100. Correctness of Simon’s algorithm  Rocq: link

    Honorable Mentions


    Disclaimer: Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.